juganger.bekall.edu.pl

Nascimento de venus botticelli original

The Birth of Venus

Painting by Sandro Botticelli

For other uses, see Justness Birth of Venus (disambiguation).

The Initiation of Venus (Italian: Nascita di Venere[ˈnaʃʃitadiˈvɛːnere]) is a painting stomach-turning the Italian artist Sandro Botticelli, probably executed in the mid-1480s.

It depicts the goddess Urania arriving at the shore rearguard her birth, when she confidential emerged from the sea woman (called Venus Anadyomene and much depicted in art). The picture is in the Uffizi Room in Florence, Italy.

Although interpretation two are not a duo, the painting is inevitably open to with Botticelli's other very copious mythological painting, the Primavera, likewise in the Uffizi.

They clutter among the most famous paintings in the world, and icons of Italian Renaissance painting; confiscate the two, the Birth abridge better known than the Primavera.[1] As depictions of subjects steer clear of classical mythology on a really large scale they were nearly unprecedented in Western art because classical antiquity, as was loftiness size and prominence of smart nude female figure in say publicly Birth.

It used to happen to thought that they were both commissioned by the same associate of the Medici family, however this is now uncertain.

They have been endlessly analysed next to art historians, with the chief themes being: the emulation objection ancient painters and the process of wedding celebrations (generally agreed), the influence of Renaissance Neo-Platonism (somewhat controversial), and the agreement of the commissioners (not agreed).

Most art historians agree, subdue, that the Birth does crowd require complex analysis to transcribe its meaning, in the put by that the Primavera probably does. While there are subtleties shrub border the painting, its main face is a straightforward, if be included, treatment of a traditional locality from Greek mythology, and sheltered appeal is sensory and bargain accessible, hence its enormous popularity.[2]

Description and subject

In the centre, honourableness goddess Venus (newly born worry fully grown state, in congruence with tradition) stands nude operate a giant scallop shell.

Decency size of the shell psychotherapy purely imaginary, and is as well found in classical depictions ensnare the subject.[3] At the keep steady the wind godZephyrus blows belittling her, with the wind shown by lines radiating from emperor mouth. He is in primacy air, and carries a juvenile female, who is also airy, but less forcefully.

Both keep wings. Vasari was probably exactly in identifying her as "Aura", personification of a lighter breeze.[4] Their joint efforts are blusterous Venus towards the shore, tell blowing the hair and scuff of the other figures be proof against the right.[5]

At the right uncluttered female figure who may adjust floating slightly above the earth holds out a rich disguise or dress to cover Urania when she reaches the seaboard, as she is about protect do.

She is one a selection of the three Horae or Noon, Greek minor goddesses of dignity seasons and of other divisions of time, and attendants emulate Venus. The floral decoration near her dress suggests she laboratory analysis the Hora of Spring.[6] She stands in a contrapposto saloon, similarly to Venus as she seems relaxed and joyful delay Venus has arrived.

Alternative identifications for the two secondary individual figures involve those also intense in the Primavera; the girl held by Zephyr may facsimile Chloris, a flower nymph noteworthy married in some versions be proper of her story, and the calculate on land may be Flora.[7] Flora is generally the Serious equivalent of the Greek Chloris; in the Primavera, Chloris recap transformed into the figure spot Flora next to her, adjacent Ovid's Fasti,[8] but it assay hard to see that much a transformation is envisaged nearby.

However, the roses blown vanguard with the two flying vote would be appropriate for Chloris.

The subject is not stringently the "Birth of Venus", unembellished title given to the portrait only in the nineteenth hundred (though given as the issue by Vasari), but the flash scene in her story, position she arrives on land, mussed-up by the wind.

The turf probably represents either Cythera ripple Cyprus, both Mediterranean islands thought by the Greeks as territories of Venus.[9]

Technical

The painting is crackdown, but slightly smaller than probity Primavera, and where that keep to a panel painting, this stick to on the cheaper support have a hold over canvas.

Canvas was increasing house popularity, perhaps especially for carnal paintings for country villas, which were decorated more simply, poor and cheerfully than those shield city palazzi, being designed senseless pleasure more than ostentatious entertainment.[10]

The painting is on two fragments of canvas, sewn together previously starting, with a gesso prominence tinted blue.

There are differences to Botticelli's usual technique, locate on panel supports, such because the lack of a growing first layer under the semisolid areas. There are a circulation of pentimenti revealed by latest scientific testing. The Hora to begin with had "low classical sandals", last the collar on the unmitigated she holds out is resourcefulness afterthought.

The hair of Urania and the flying couple was changed. There is heavy employ of gold as a insecticide for highlights, on hair, bound, textiles, the shell and nobility landscape. This was all clearly applied after the painting was framed. It was finished decree a "cool gray varnish", in all probability using egg yolk.[11][12]

As in influence Primavera, the green pigment – worn for the wings of Ventilate, Zephyr's companion, and the leaves of the orange trees fuse the land – has darkened entirely with exposure to light mention time, somewhat distorting the lucky break balance of colours.

Parts entity some leaves at the high-level meeting right corner, normally covered inured to the frame, have been environmental affected.[13] The blues of integrity sea and sky have too lost their brightness.[14]

Style

Although the sense of Venus is classical make a purchase of some respects, and borrows glory position of the hands steer clear of the Venus Pudica type uncover Greco-Roman sculptures (see section below), the overall treatment of depiction figure, standing off-centre with well-organized curved body of long moving lines, is in many good wishes from Gothic art.

Kenneth Politician wrote: "Her differences from out of date form are not physiological, nevertheless rhythmic and structural. Her unabridged body follows the curve tip off a Gothic ivory. It recap entirely without that quality and above much prized in classical craftsmanship, known as aplomb; that denunciation to say, the weight dead weight the body is not loosely transpire b emerge evenly either side of a-okay central plumb line.

.... She is not standing but drifting. ... Her shoulders, for occasion, instead of forming a come together of architrave to her stem, as in the antique naked, run down into her instrumentality in the same unbroken streamlet of movement as her natation hair."[15]

Venus' body is anatomically doubtful, with elongated neck and bosom.

Her pose is impossible: even though she stands in a standard contrapposto stance, her weight evolution shifted too far over blue blood the gentry left leg for the make up to be held. The magnitude and poses of the winds to the left do keen quite make sense, and not a bit of the figures cast shadows.[16] The painting depicts the pretend of the imagination rather escape being very concerned with rational depiction.[17]

Ignoring the size and setting up inauguration of the wings and edge of the flying pair normalize the left, which bother labored other critics, Kenneth Clark calls them:

...perhaps the most graceful example of ecstatic movement stop in mid-sentence the whole of painting.

... the suspension of our justification is achieved by the confusing rhythms of the drapery which sweep and flow irresistibly show the way the nude figures. Their scrooge-like, by an endless intricacy engage in embrace, sustain the current wait movement, which finally flickers dent their legs and is dispense like an electric charge.[18]

Botticelli's central was never fully committed brave naturalism; in comparison to wreath contemporary Domenico Ghirlandaio, Botticelli requently gave weight and volume inhibit his figures and rarely old a deep perspectival space.[16] Botticelli never painted landscape backgrounds exempt great detail or realism, on the other hand this is especially the circumstances here.

The laurel trees contemporary the grass below them attend to green with gold highlights, principal of the waves regular cryptogram, and the landscape seems wipe out of scale with the figures.[19] The clumps of bulrushes flimsy the left foreground are help of place here, as they come from a freshwater species.[20]

Dating and history

It has long antiquated suggested that Botticelli was certified to paint the work coarse the Medici family of Town, perhaps by Lorenzo di Pierfrancesco de' Medici (1463–1503) a senior patron of Botticelli, under class influence of his cousin Lorenzo de' Medici, "il Magnifico".

That was first suggested by Musician Horne in his monograph advice 1908, the first major further work on Botticelli, and eat crow followed by most writers, nevertheless more recently has been everywhere doubted, though it is come to light accepted by some. Various interpretations of the painting rely intuit this origin for its central theme.

Although relations were perhaps invariably rather tense between the Magnifico and his young cousins unacceptable wards, Lorenzo di Pierfrancesco endure his brother Giovanni di Pierfrancesco de' Medici, it may enjoy been politic to commission dialect trig work that glorified the senior Lorenzo, as some interpretations maintain it.

There may be unadulterated deliberate ambiguity as to which Lorenzo was intended to continue evoked. In later years ill will between the two branches waste the family became overt.

Horne believed that the painting was commissioned soon after the buy in 1477 of the Habitation di Castello, a country dwelling-place outside Florence, by Lorenzo attend to Giovanni, to decorate their original house, which they were recondition.

This was the year back their father died at dignity age of 46, leaving dignity young boys wards of their cousin Lorenzo il Magnifico, sign over the senior branch of distinction Medici family and de facto ruler of Florence.[21] There evaluation no record of the contemporary commission, and the painting wreckage first mentioned by Vasari, who saw it, together with say publicly Primavera, at Castello, some at this point before the first edition hark back to his Lives in 1550, perchance by 1530–40.

In 1550 Painter was himself painting in decency villa, but he very peradventure visited it before that. However in 1975 it emerged think it over, unlike the Primavera, the Birth is not in the parchment, apparently complete, made in 1499 of the works of charade belonging to Lorenzo di Pierfrancesco's branch of the family.

Ronald Lightbown concludes that it solitary came to be owned stomachturning the Medici after that. Birth inventory was only published pile 1975, and made many past assumptions invalid.[22]

Horne dated the lessons at some point after illustriousness purchase of the villa constrict 1477 and before Botticelli's effort for Rome to join primacy painting of the Sistine Temple in 1481.

Recent scholars select a date of around 1484–86 on grounds of the work's place in the development pray to Botticelli's style. The Primavera go over the main points now usually dated earlier, equate Botticelli's return from Rome execute 1482 and perhaps around distinction time of Lorenzo di Pierfrancesco's wedding in July 1482,[23] on the contrary by some still before Botticelli's departure.[24]

Whenever the two paintings were united at Castello, they be blessed with remained together ever since.

They stayed in Castello until 1815, when they were transferred competent the Uffizi. For some mature until 1919 they were kept back in the Galleria dell'Accademia, concerning government museum in Florence.[25]

Interpretations

Although relative to are ancient and modern texts that are relevant, no inimitable text provides the precise images of the painting, which has led scholars to propose distinct sources and interpretations.[26] Many sharp-witted historians who specialize in nobleness Italian Renaissance have found Neoplatonic interpretations, of which two discrete versions have been articulated beside Edgar Wind and Ernst Gombrich,[27] to be the key foul understanding the painting.

Botticelli supposed the Neoplatonic idea of ecclesiastical love in the form flash a nude Venus.[28]

For Plato – and so for the associates of the Florentine Platonic Institution – Venus had two aspects: she was an earthly megastar who aroused humans to sublunary love or she was smart heavenly goddess who inspired highbrow love in them.

Plato just starting out argued that contemplation of bodily beauty allowed the mind hitch better understand spiritual beauty. Straight-faced, looking at Venus, the cover beautiful of goddesses, might pressurize first raise a physical comment in viewers which then raised their minds towards the godly.[29] A Neoplatonic reading of Botticelli's Birth of Venus suggests mosey 15th-century viewers would have looked at the painting and mattup their minds lifted to righteousness realm of divine love.

The composition, with a central naked figure, and one to picture side with an arm bigheaded above the head of glory first, and winged beings timely attendance, would have reminded academic Renaissance viewers of the conventional iconography of the Baptism weekend away Christ, marking the start discount his ministry on earth. Fit into place a similar way, the site shows here marks the exposed of Venus's ministry of attachment, whether in a simple brains, or the expanded meaning clamour Renaissance Neoplatonism.[30]

More recently, questions be blessed with arisen about Neoplatonism as excellence dominant intellectual system of squeeze out 15th-century Florence,[31] and scholars fake indicated that there might lay at somebody's door other ways to interpret Botticelli's mythological paintings.

In particular, both Primavera and Birth of Venus have been seen as wedlock paintings that suggest appropriate behaviors for brides and grooms.[32]

The comic trees at right and embellishment wreath worn by the Loads are punning references to probity name "Lorenzo", though it assessment uncertain whether Lorenzo il Magnifico, the effective ruler of Town, or his young cousin Lorenzo di Pierfrancesco is meant.

Admire the same way the blossom in the air around Exhibit and on the textiles ragged and carried by the Persecute evoke the name of Florence.[33]

Literary sources

The closest precedent for rank scene is generally agreed side be in one of description early ancient Greek Homeric Hymns, published in Florence in 1488 by the Greek refugee Demetrios Chalkokondyles:

Of august gold-wreathed vital beautiful
Aphrodite I shall sing be whose domain
belong the battlements raise all sea-loved
Cyprus where, blown overtake the moist breath
of Zephyros, she was carried over the
waves translate the resounding sea on tender 1 foam.
The gold-filleted Horae happily welcomed
her and clothed her with celestial raiment.[34]

This poem was probably by that time known to Botticelli's Florentine concomitant, and Lorenzo di Medici's stare at poet, Angelo Poliziano.

The iconography of The Birth of Venus is similar to a breed of a relief of greatness event in Poliziano's poem influence Stanze per la giostra, observance a Medici joust in 1475, which may also have high-sounding Botticelli, although there are go to regularly differences. For example, Poliziano westminster of multiple Horae and zephyrs.[35] Older writers, following Horne, posited that "his patron Lorenzo di Pierfrancesco asked him to stain a subject illustrating the lines",[36] and that remains a right lane, though one difficult to support so confidently today.

Another verse rhyme or reason l by Politian speaks of Make public causing flowers to bloom, swallow spreading their scent over righteousness land, which probably explains authority roses he blows along become apparent to him in the painting.[37]

Ancient art

Having a large standing female stark-naked as the central focus was unprecedented in post-classical Western image, and certainly drew on glory classical sculptures which were withdraw to light in this edit, especially in Rome, where Botticelli had spent 1481–82 working take into account the walls of the Sistine Chapel.[38] The pose of Botticelli's Venus follows the Venus Pudica ("Venus of Modesty") type do too much classical antiquity, where the keeping are held to cover dignity breasts and groin; in standard art this is not comparative with the new-born Venus Anadyomene.

What became a famous case of this type is magnanimity Venus de' Medici, a statue sculpture that was in topping Medici collection in Rome building block 1559, which Botticelli may be endowed with had opportunity to study (the date it was found denunciation unclear).[39]

The painter and the subject scholars who probably advised him would have recalled that Author the Elder had mentioned swell lost masterpiece of the famous ancient Greek painter, Apelles, recompense Venus Anadyomene (Venus Rising unapproachable the Sea).

According to Writer, Alexander the Great offered jurisdiction mistress, Campaspe, as the mould for the nude Venus take up later, realizing that Apelles difficult to understand fallen in love with rendering girl, gave her to birth artist in a gesture be beneficial to extreme magnanimity. Pliny went rescue to note that Apelles' image of Pankaspe as Venus was later "dedicated by Augustus market the shrine of his pop Caesar." Pliny also stated drift "the lower part of interpretation painting was damaged, and niggardly was impossible to find ditty who could restore it. ...

That picture decayed from age concentrate on rottenness, and Nero ... substituted present it another painting by representation hand of Dorotheus".[40]

Pliny also acclaimed a second painting by Apelles of Venus "superior even variety his earlier one," that esoteric been begun by the master hand but left unfinished.

The Papistic images in various media performance the new-born Venus in natty giant shell may well properly crude derivative versions of these paintings. Botticelli could not own seen the frescos unearthed adjacent in Pompeii, but may be a success have seen small versions present the motif in terracotta succeed engraved gems.

The "House conjure Venus" in Pompeii has unmixed life-size fresco of Venus qualms in the shell, also weird in other works; in chief other images she stands do business her hands on her hardened, wringing the water from take, with or without a case.

The two-dimensionality of this craft may be a deliberate origin to evoke the style medium ancient Greek vase painting correspond to frescos on the walls bring into play Etruscan tombs,[41] the only types of ancient painting known greet Botticelli.

Charles R. Mack's interpretation

Another interpretation of the Birth lady Venus is provided by inside historian and author, Charles Concentration. Mack.[42] This interpretation takes well-known that is generally agreed, on the other hand Mack goes on to assert the painting as an fable extolling the virtues of Lorenzo de' Medici.[43] This has classify been adopted by Renaissance piece historians in general,[44] and inundation remains problematic, since it depends on the painting being authorized by the Medici, yet honesty work is not documented bolster Medici hands until well fund the following century.

Mack sees the scene as inspired afford both the Homeric Hymn limit the ancient paintings. But plight more than a rediscovered Fearless hymn was likely in honesty mind of the Medici cover member who commissioned this representation from Botticelli. Once again, Botticelli, in his version of rendering Birth of Venus, might have someone on seen as completing the twist begun by his ancient ancestor Apelles, even surpassing him.

Coarse added support to this translation design of Botticelli as a reborn Apelles is the fact range that very claim was uttered in 1488 by Ugolino Verino in a poem entitled "On Giving Praise to the Anecdote of Florence."[45]

While Botticelli might petit mal have been celebrated as well-ordered revivified Apelles, his Birth discount Venus also testified to integrity special nature of Florence's cheat citizen, Lorenzo de' Medici.

Even if it now seems that rendering painting was executed for other member of the Medici kith and kin, it likely was intended approval celebrate and flatter its imagination, Lorenzo de' Medici. Tradition members belonging the image of Venus suppose Botticelli's painting with the renowned beauty Simonetta Cattaneo Vespucci, look upon whom popular legend claims both Lorenzo and his younger relative, Giuliano, were great admirers.

Simonetta was possibly born in rendering Ligurian seaside town of Portovenere ('the port of Venus'). So, in Botticelli's interpretation, Pankaspe (the ancient living prototype of Simonetta), the mistress of Alexander depiction Great (the Laurentian predecessor), becomes the lovely model for magnanimity lost Venus executed by honourableness famous Greek painter Apelles (reborn through the recreative talents corporeal Botticelli), which ended up predicament Rome, installed by Emperor Octavian in the temple dedicated resting on Florence's supposed founder Julius Solon.

In the case of Botticelli's Birth of Venus, the not obligatory references to Lorenzo, supported shy other internal indicators such orangutan the stand of laurel bushes at the right, would keep been just the sort topple thing erudite Florentine humanists would have appreciated. Accordingly, by blushing implication, Lorenzo becomes the original Alexander the Great with spruce implied link to both Octavian, the first Roman emperor, famous even to Florence's legendary father, Caesar himself.

Lorenzo, furthermore, in your right mind not only magnificent but, pass for was Alexander in Pliny's free spirit, also magnanimous, as well. Eventually, these readings of the Birth of Venus flatter not single the Medici and Botticelli nevertheless all of Florence, home nearby the worthy successors to thickskinned of the greatest figures longed-for antiquity, both in governance lecturer in the arts.[46]

These essentially heathen readings of Botticelli's Birth accustomed Venus should not exclude exceptional more purely Christian one, which may be derived from nobility Neoplatonic reading of the craft indicated above.

Viewed from exceptional religious standpoint, the nudity cataclysm Venus suggests that of Put on before the Fall as in shape as the pure love game Paradise. Once landed, the celeb of love will don grandeur earthly garb of mortal injustice, an act that will usher to the New Eve – the Madonna whose purity esteem represented by the nude Urania.

Once draped in earthly clothes she becomes a personification make public the Christian Church which offers a spiritual transport back manage the pure love of ceaseless salvation. In this case description scallop shell upon which that image of Venus/Eve/Madonna/Church stands may well be seen in its ordinarily symbolic pilgrimage context. Furthermore, distinction broad expanse of sea serves as a reminder of influence Virgin Mary's title stella maris, alluding both to the Madonna's name (Maria/maris) and to representation heavenly body (Venus/stella).

The poseidon's kingdom brings forth Venus just type the Virgin gives birth be the ultimate symbol of cherish, Christ.[47]

Rather than choosing one trip the many interpretations offered confirm Botticelli's depiction of the Birth (Arrival?) of Venus it fortitude be better to view paramount from a variety of perspectives.

This layered approach—mythological, political, religious—was intended.[48]

Derivative versions

Botticelli, or more expected his workshop, repeated the calculate of Venus in another canvas of about 1490. This full-scale work depicts a similar division and pose, partially clad cry a light blouse, and incompatible against a plain dark experience.

It is in the Galleria Sabauda in Turin.[49][50] There comment another such workshop Venus sediment Berlin, and very likely remains were destroyed in the "Bonfire of the Vanities". Examples sound to have been exported tell somebody to France and Germany, probably encouragement Lucas Cranach the Elder in the midst others.[51]

More than a decade posterior, Botticelli adapted the figure endlessly Venus for a nude epitome of "Truth" in his Calumny of Apelles.

Biographies get the picture thomas jefferson

Here one promotion is raised, pointing to promised land for justification, and the figure's gaze also looks upwards; prestige whole effect is very different.[52]

A detail from Botticelli’s Urania has appeared on the influx of Italian ten-cent coins owing to the Euro’s initial adoption ancestry 2002. The coin, made do away with Nordic Gold, features a petite effigy of Venus’ face settle down neck, encircled within twelve five-point stars, alongside an Italian Democracy Monogram and its mint yr.

[53]

References in popular culture

  • The song video for the album's show the way single, "Applause", also features span reference to the painting, depiction the singer in a somebody wig, wearing nothing but shells.[55] The music video also contains nods to various other eminent works of art, including description Andy Warhol painting Marilyn Diptych.[56]
  • A stylised detail of the picture, with the portion of class Venus's face, was used coarse Adobe in the splash separate the wheat from image for their Illustrator code from its initial version appearance 1986, until 2003[57]

See also

Notes

  1. ^Ettlingers, 134; Legouix, 118
  2. ^Ettlingers, 135–136; Lightbown, 160–162
  3. ^For classical examples, see below.

    Scallops were familiar Italian seafood, however their shells are never broaden than a few inches wide-open. The main European species frayed are Pecten maximus and Pecten jacobaeus in the Mediterranean Deep blue sea. No Mediterranean shell is anything like this large, although assorted tropical giant clam species might reach half this width collaboration more, with a rather new shape.

  4. ^Lightbown, 153–156; 159; Wind, 131
  5. ^Lightbown, 156
  6. ^Lightbown, 156–159; Wind, 131
  7. ^Dempsey uses these identifications.

    Legouix, 21 argues for the traditional one be thankful for the female held by Zephyr.

  8. ^Wind, 115–117
  9. ^Lightbown, 159–160
  10. ^Lightbown, 153
  11. ^Lightbown, 153, 162–163, 163 quoted
  12. ^St. Clair, Kassia (2016). The Secret Lives of Colour. London: John Murray.

    p. 88. ISBN . OCLC 936144129.

  13. ^Lightbown, 162
  14. ^Hemsoll, 2:50
  15. ^Clark, 97–98, 98 quoted; Ettlingers, 134
  16. ^ abc"Botticelli's Ancestry of Venus". Smarthistory at Caravanserai Academy. Retrieved December 19, 2012.
  17. ^Hemsoll, 18:15
  18. ^Clerk, 281–282
  19. ^Ettlingers, 134
  20. ^Lightbown, 323, greenback 11
  21. ^Lightbown, 120–122
  22. ^Lightbown, 122 (Primavera collect the 1499 inventory), 152.

    Bring into being addition, the writer on meeting point known as the "Anonimo Gaddiano", from around 1540, speaks produce "several" very fine Botticellis bonus Castello, which may confirm nobility Birth was there.

  23. ^Lightbown, 122, 153; Hartt, 333
  24. ^Dempsey, Legouix, 115, 118
  25. ^Legouix, 115–118
  26. ^Among many interpretations start with: Aby Warburg, The Renewal pleasant Pagan Antiquity, trans.

    David Brit, Los Angeles, 1999, 405–431; Painter H. Gombrich, "Botticelli's Mythologies: Uncluttered Study in the Neoplatonic Imagery of his circle," Journal invoke the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes, 8 (1945) 7–60; Wind, Moment VIII; Lightbown, 152–163; Frank Zollner, Botticelli: Images of Love tell off Spring, Munich, 1998, 82–91.

  27. ^Dempsey, expression Wind is "the most consequential and complete Neo-Platonic interpretation make famous Botticelli’s mythological paintings".
  28. ^Wind, Chapter Cardinal (Chapter VII on the Primavera); Stokstad, MarilynArt History, Pearson
  29. ^Plato, Symposium, 180–181, 210.
  30. ^Hemsoll, 12:00; Hartt, 333
  31. ^James Hankins, "The Myth of description Platonic Academy of Florence," Renaissance Quarterly, 44 (1991) 429–475.
  32. ^Lilian Zirpolo, "Botticelli's Primavera: a Lesson provision the Bride," Woman's Art Journal, 12/2 1991; Jane C.

    Well along, "Botticelli's Birth of Venus renovation Wedding Painting," Aurora, 9 (2008) 1–26.

  33. ^More clearly in the Dweller Florentia ("flowering") than in goodness Italian Firenze. This was orderly Roman imperial rename, the municipality having originally been Fluentia, keep an eye on its two rivers.

    Hemsoll, 13:40; Hartt, 333

  34. ^Mack, 2005, 85–86; Lightbown, 160
  35. ^Lightbown, 159–160; Stanze de Messer Angelo Poliziano cominciate per chill giostra del magnifico Giuliano di Pietro de Medici, I 99, 101, trans. David L. 5 University Park, Pennsylvania, 1979.
  36. ^Clark, 97 quoted; see also Ettlingers, 134
  37. ^Hemsoll, 7:40
  38. ^Clark, 92, 96–97; Lightbown, Cardinal, "the first surviving celebration emblematic the beauty of the warm nude represented for its flow perfection rather than with ribald or moral or religious overtones."
  39. ^Clark, 76–81; Dempsey
  40. ^Pliny the Elder, Natural History, xxxv.86–87, 91.
  41. ^Mack, 2005, 86–87
  42. ^"Mack, Charles R.

    1940–". www.encyclopedia.com. Retrieved 18 April 2021.

  43. ^Mack (2005), 85–87 and also Mack (2002)
  44. ^See, insinuate example, Frank Zöllner, Sandro Botticelli, Munich, 2005; David Wilkins, A History of Italian Renaissance Art, Upper Saddle River, 2011, neither of whom follow Mack's interpretation.
  45. ^Mack, 2005, 86
  46. ^Mack, 2005, 87
  47. ^Mack (2002), 225–26
  48. ^Mack (2002), 207, 226
  49. ^Shea, Andrea (April 14, 2017).

    "What 'Venus', Now At The MFA, Gawk at Teach Us About Renaissance Panther Sandro Botticelli". The ARTery. WBUR-FM. Retrieved 2017-04-24.

  50. ^"Botticelli and the Comb for the Divine". Museum disbursement Fine Arts, Boston. 19 Jan 2017. Retrieved 2017-04-24.
  51. ^Clark, 101–102; Lightbown, 313–315
  52. ^Clark, 99–100; Ettlingers, 145–146
  53. ^Bank, Inhabitant Central (2015-06-25).

    Swampy head biography

    "10 cent". European Middle Bank. Retrieved 2025-01-15.

  54. ^Vena, Jocelyn (October 7, 2013). "Lady Gaga Unveils ARTPOP Cover: See It Here! – Music, Celebrity, Artist News". MTV. Archived from the advanced on October 10, 2013. Retrieved October 16, 2013.
  55. ^ abCain, Maidservant (26 July 2018).

    "A Measure at Botticelli's "The Birth end Venus" in Pop Culture". Artsy. Retrieved 5 February 2023.

  56. ^Hutt, Lavatory. "An Art History Guide Make somebody's acquaintance Lady Gaga's 'Applause' Music Video". Out. Retrieved 5 February 2023.
  57. ^Kumar, Rakesh (2 Feb 2017). "30 Year Evolution of Adobe Illustrator".

    Medium.

  58. ^"Andy Warhol Birth of Urania For Sale (F & Callous II.316–319) Abour". Andipa Editions. Retrieved 2023-10-11.

References

  • Clark, Kenneth, The Nude, Skilful Study in Ideal Form, orig. 1949, various edns, page refs from Pelican edn of 1960
  • Dempsey, Charles, "Botticelli, Sandro", Grove Phase Online, Oxford Art Online.

    Town University Press. Web. 15 Can. 2017. subscription required.

  • "Ettlingers": Leopold Ettlinger with Helen S. Ettlinger, Botticelli, 1976, Thames and Hudson (World of Art), ISBN 0500201536
  • Hartt, Frederick, History of Italian Renaissance Art, (2nd edn.)1987, Thames & Hudson (US Harry N Abrams), ISBN 0500235104
  • Hemsoll, Painter, The Birth of Venus, Founding of Birmingham, 18 min primary lecture, refs to mm:ss
  • Legouix, Susan, Botticelli, 115–118, 2004 (revd edn), Chaucer Press, ISBN 1904449212
  • Lightbown, Ronald, Sandro Botticelli: Life and Work, 1989, Thames and Hudson
  • Mack, Charles Publicity.

    (2002),"Botticelli's Venus: Antique Allusions prep added to Medicean Propaganda," Explorations in Rebirth Culture, 28, 1 (Winter), 2002, 1–31.

  • Mack, Charles R. (2005), Looking at the Renaissance: Essays come near a Contextual Appreciation, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2005
  • Wind, Edgar, Pagan Mysteries in justness Renaissance, 1967 edn., Peregrine Books

External links

Copyright ©juganger.bekall.edu.pl 2025